Calling a Hit Point a Smeerp

“A good-enough [post] violently written now is better than a perfect [post] meticulously written never.” – Elizabeth Gilbert on novels, modified

Psychochild recently discussed doing away with hit points. To my armchair game developer’s eyes, at first glance this would seem to me to be the product of wishful thinking; however, Mr. Green is an experienced game developer and this therefore merits closer inspection. Reigning World Commenting Champion Bhagpuss suggested that this is semantics. While I am personally not interested in the epistemology behind this, I would agree that semantics play a large role in such a discussion insofar as the attempt to design away hit points is very prone to the trope of Calling a Hit Point a Smeerp due to the enormously useful role they play.

Toughness, resilience, fatigue, vitality: any of these may be substituted for “hit points” or “health” without fundamentally altering the basic notion of numbers as a convenient form of shorthand readily understood by humans for determining win/lose, failure/success, or victory/defeat conditions, whatever you like to call them. (Semantics, indeed.) Reduce them to zero and you are done. By comparison, using numbers to represent levels is rather less scalar than one might be led to believe: they may represent an amalgam of things such as they do in stock Oblivion, where gaining five of anything results in a level up; or they may function as a temporary placeholder for levels by another name, e.g. item levels, such as in post-level cap Final Fantasy 14. Designing away levels is therefore not terribly problematic because they can represent a variety of notions with regard to how powerful a character is presumed to be and thus have a large pool of notional equivalents or approximations.

Hit points, on the other hand, are an objective measure of how dead you are. They are the beating of your heart. For those of us who are not pursuing a degree in cardiology, moving beyond one’s pulse opens up a world of possibilities that implicitly assume continued blood supply to the body without having to constantly reference it. Correspondingly, there are a myriad of systems which have been designed that downplay the fundamental primacy of hit points. There are two that immediately come to my mind: Hearthstone and Achaea. Hearthstone is a well-known trading card game; Achaea is a long-lived MUD which uses afflictions, pipes, salves and so forth in a complex system of play and counterplay (to the point that a client and prepackaged script library are recommended to be able to keep up defensively).

Neither of these games has innovated in the domain of player health and yet both offer a play experience that is substantially different from that found in Eorzea, a crushingly beautiful world overpopulated by hit point sponges. It was not necessary in these cases to redesign the fundamentally binary status indicator that hit points represent; acknowledging that health bar whittling may not be enjoyable for the non-woodworking enthusiasts among us is sufficient as a first step.


3 thoughts on “Calling a Hit Point a Smeerp

  1. Am I a terrible person if I just feel like hopping around going, “Smeep smeep!” nonsensically because that’s the first thing that came to mind after reading the title? 😉

    J/k. Great read, doesn’t read like a good-enough post in the least.

    Don’t have much to add beyond the idle thought that Puzzle Pirates is another example of a game that downplays hit points quite a bit, the closest analogue is a numerical value of damage that ships can take. Instead it determines win/loss mostly by (team) success at a minigame, and there is also the less binary option for a draw or disengaging in sea battles, besides straight up win/loss.


    1. Meep meep! No, you’re not terrible – it’s required! I played Puzzle Pirates for a bit. Not my thing at all because I hate mini-games. I mostly saved up currency so I could go spend it playing poker. There are no hit points in poker unless things get *really* nasty.


    2. Oh, there’s a thought. Why are there no drawn results in MMOs? In most real-world competitive activities the possibility of a drawn game, match, round, bout or even series is baked in. Just about any game that has a scoring system offers the possibility of a draw. Tennis stands out as an exception although even there it can end up being the first to exhaustion rather than to an actual knock-out blow.

      And speaking of knock-outs, boxing, perhaps the most obvious direct analogy to the kind of one-on-one player vs NPC gameplay staple, by no means always ends in a clear, unambiguous victory. It takes a bunch of third parties to make an assessment and even then sometimes they can come out even.

      How would an MMO work with draws? I guess the nearest we have are stalemates, where you know you aren’t going to die and the NPC isn’t going to kill you and you end up stopping out of boredom, but that’s hardly the same thing.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s